Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put KAT (a token on the Katana chain) into this vault, and Yearn lends it out to borrowers who post avKAT as collateral—essentially a wrapped or derivative form of KAT itself. The interest rate is set by supply and demand; right now there's modest demand (42% of the vault's KAT is lent out) and the vault earns 0.76% APY on the capital that's deployed.
Yearn runs this vault and appears to operate a narrow, single-asset book—100% KAT lent against KAT collateral on a small base ($0.2M TVL).
The APY comes entirely from borrowing demand for avKAT. With only 42% utilization, most yield comes from that deployed portion; no idle cash, no incentive programs listed.
The vault's risk is concentrated in KAT itself—both the lent asset and the collateral are the same token, so a KAT price drop would reduce the un-borrowed buffer and push borrowers toward liquidation (the threshold is 77% LTV). The risk engine scores this 28/100 (low severity) and flags no elevated issues, but the single-asset exposure means no diversification hedge.
Good fit for KAT believers seeking modest yield on small amounts; avoid if you need diversification or want to hedge KAT exposure elsewhere in your portfolio.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
Yearn KAT vault lends to Katana specific markets. Optimization across markets is handled automatically via an algorithm developed by Yearn. Supply caps are set based on various factors and continuously monitored by the Yearn team as well.
Morpho V2 vault — wraps downstream Morpho markets and V1 vaults via adapters.
Some V2 adapters point at Morpho Blue markets directly; their underlying market detail isn't resolvable in the universe-level fetch, so this vault carries a V2 opacity surcharge in the risk model.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
V2 vaults route through adapters into downstream venues. A misbehaving adapter (paused, drained, or pointing at a compromised target) can lock or mismark a portion of the vault until governance acts.
Sequencer halt on Katana blocks liquidations and redemptions for 48 hours. Without per-allocation buffers we apply a baseline 0.5% liquidity discount scaled by chain severity (1.5×).
Vault has $0M idle buffer (100% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 0-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (1)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.