SingularV USDT
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put in USDT and the vault lends it out to borrowers on Morpho Blue who post sUSDe (Ethena's staked USD), WBTC, or XAUt (physical gold token) as collateral. Interest comes from the borrowing demand against those collateral types. All deposits are deployed—there's no idle cash.
SingularV runs this vault; the data shows a stablecoin-only lending book focused on blue-chip collateral (Ethereum staking yields, bitcoin, tokenized gold).
The 2.45% APY comes entirely from borrowing demand against sUSDe (43% of capital), WBTC (28%), and XAUt (28%), where utilization rates range from 65% to 81%. No incentive programs are listed.
Primary risk is sUSDe depeg (43% of the vault)—if Ethena's staking mechanism breaks, collateral value falls and liquidation prices move down. Secondary risk is WBTC and XAUt price crashes, though the vault's LLTV (loan-to-liquidation-value) ratios of 77–92% provide cushion. The risk score of 29/100 reflects this manageable shape.
Good fit for conservative allocators seeking low-volatility USDT yield if comfortable holding indirect exposure to sUSDe stability; avoid if you require zero correlation to Ethereum liquid staking or tokenized commodities.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
SingularV USDT lending vault on Morpho V2 that allocates across diversified collateral markets to optimize risk-adjusted yield. Curated by SingularV, the vault dynamically manages exposure across multiple collateral types to maximize returns for depositors.
Morpho V2 vault — wraps downstream Morpho markets and V1 vaults via adapters.
Some V2 adapters point at Morpho Blue markets directly; their underlying market detail isn't resolvable in the universe-level fetch, so this vault carries a V2 opacity surcharge in the risk model.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Tether has repeatedly traded <$0.95 (Oct 2018, May 2022). Recovery is slower than USDC. Mark-to-market loss on 100% of vault TVL (the loan asset is USDT).
V2 vaults route through adapters into downstream venues. A misbehaving adapter (paused, drained, or pointing at a compromised target) can lock or mismark a portion of the vault until governance acts.
Vault has $0M idle buffer (100% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 0-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (4)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.