Riva x Steakhouse EURC
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put EURC (a euro stablecoin on Base) into this vault, which lends it out entirely to borrowers who post ethereum-related collateral—mostly wrapped staked ETH (wstETH), with smaller positions in Bitcoin and plain ETH. The interest rate floats based on how much borrowers demand relative to available supply.
Steakhouse Financial runs this vault and has built it as a concentrated ethereum collateral play—73% of lending is against wstETH alone.
The 0.99% APY comes entirely from borrowing demand against ethereum collateral. There is no un-borrowed cash buffer; all deposits are deployed. No incentive programs are listed.
The vault's risk concentrates on wstETH (73%), which carries two layers of risk: the price of ETH itself and the operational risk of Lido's staking mechanism. If ethereum falls sharply or Lido faces issues, collateral values drop and borrowers may be liquidated, forcing the vault to realize losses on its collateral sales.
Good fit for conservative allocators if they want direct EUR stablecoin yield backed by ethereum collateral; avoid if you need diversification away from ETH or are uncomfortable with lido's centralization.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
EURC vault for Riva ecosystem.
Morpho V2 vault — wraps downstream Morpho markets and V1 vaults via adapters.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho V2 that affects the vault's largest single market (73% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 72.8% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 97%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
V2 vaults route through adapters into downstream venues. A misbehaving adapter (paused, drained, or pointing at a compromised target) can lock or mismark a portion of the vault until governance acts.
Vault has $0M idle buffer (19% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.88% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 11-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (5)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.