KPK USDT Prime
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
KPK USDT Prime lends out USDT deposited by users and earns interest by lending it to borrowers who put up crypto collateral — mainly liquid staking tokens like weETH and wstETH, plus smaller positions in WBTC, synthetic USDT (syrupUSDT), and gold-backed XAUt. The interest rate floats based on demand to borrow against each collateral type, with no idle cash sitting around.
KPK runs a focused stablecoin lending book concentrated in liquid staking collateral and synthetic assets, with tight risk parameters (LLTV ranging 77–92%).
The 2.99% APY comes entirely from borrowing demand across the five collateral markets, with weETH and syrupUSDT each representing 41% of deployed capital at 76–84% utilization rates.
The vault is tightly hedged to stablecoin-on-crypto lending: 41% of the book is syrupUSDT (a synthetic asset), and 49% is liquid staking tokens (weETH, wstETH). If LST de-pegs or syrupUSDT fails, collateral haircuts could hit hard; the risk score of 28/100 reflects these concentrated bets despite high LLTVs.
Good fit for allocators seeking simple stablecoin yield on Ethereum if they're comfortable with LST and synthetic asset concentration; avoid if you need broad collateral diversification or fear stablecoin basis risk.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
A low-risk USDT vault with 24h automation. Allocations are continuously rebalanced across liquid markets with strict collateral filters to preserve liquidity and mitigate risk.
Morpho V2 vault — wraps downstream Morpho markets and V1 vaults via adapters.
Some V2 adapters point at Morpho Blue markets directly; their underlying market detail isn't resolvable in the universe-level fetch, so this vault carries a V2 opacity surcharge in the risk model.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Tether has repeatedly traded <$0.95 (Oct 2018, May 2022). Recovery is slower than USDC. Mark-to-market loss on 100% of vault TVL (the loan asset is USDT).
V2 vaults route through adapters into downstream venues. A misbehaving adapter (paused, drained, or pointing at a compromised target) can lock or mismark a portion of the vault until governance acts.
Vault has $1M idle buffer (100% of $1M TVL). $49M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 0-day TVM cost. $49M of the request exceeds the vault's $1M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (7)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.