Gauntlet EURC Core
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put in EURC (a euro-backed stablecoin on Ethereum) and earn interest from borrowers who post WBTC as collateral. The vault lends out 100% of deposits into a single market where borrowers can borrow EURC against bitcoin held at 86% loan-to-value—meaning lenders get paid only if someone wants to borrow stablecoins against BTC.
Gauntlet operates this vault, running a single-collateral, single-loan-asset book focused on WBTC/EURC lending.
APY of 0.38% comes entirely from the WBTC/EURC market where the vault is deployed at 63% utilization. No incentive programs are listed; yield is borrowing interest alone.
The vault carries concentrated risk to WBTC price moves (100% of capital lent against bitcoin at an 86% LTV). A sharp BTC decline could trigger liquidations and reduce borrowing demand. The risk and complexity scores are both low (27/100 and 35/100), and EURC shows no depeg signals.
Good fit for a conservative allocator seeking minimal stablecoin yield with bitcoin-collateral exposure; avoid if you need diversification or higher returns.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
The Gauntlet EURC Balanced vault aims to optimize for risk-adjusted yield across large and medium market cap assets and high liquidity yield sources. The vaults risk strategy follows Gauntlets Balanced framework whereby we curate supply to balance security and yield to provide a low risk profile at competitive APYs.
Morpho V2 vault — wraps downstream Morpho markets and V1 vaults via adapters.
Some V2 adapters point at Morpho Blue markets directly; their underlying market detail isn't resolvable in the universe-level fetch, so this vault carries a V2 opacity surcharge in the risk model.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
V2 vaults route through adapters into downstream venues. A misbehaving adapter (paused, drained, or pointing at a compromised target) can lock or mismark a portion of the vault until governance acts.
Vault has $0M idle buffer (37% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 9-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho V2 that affects the vault's largest single market (0% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 0.0% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 0%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (5)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.