fxUSD Agentic Stablecoin
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put in fxUSD (a stablecoin on Base) and earn interest by lending it to borrowers who post VVV tokens or cbBTC as collateral. The interest rate adjusts based on how much of the vault's fxUSD is borrowed at any given time — currently both markets are 91–92% deployed.
9Summits runs this vault, concentrating 58% of capital into VVV (a lower-collateral-quality asset at 63% loan-to-value) and 42% into cbBTC (Bitcoin-backed, 86% loan-to-value).
The 9.61% APY comes from borrowing demand on two collateral types — the bulk from VVV borrowers, the rest from cbBTC borrowers — with zero idle fxUSD sitting unborrowed.
VVV tokens (58% of lending) carry token concentration and depeg risk; cbBTC (42%) is less volatile but still non-native Bitcoin. Both markets run at 91–92% utilization, leaving little buffer before rates spike if demand drops.
Suitable for allocators comfortable with altcoin collateral (VVV, cbBTC) seeking mid-single-digit stablecoin yields on Base; avoid if you require lending against mainstream L1 collateral or lower utilization.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
The 9Summits fxUSD Agentic Stablecoin vault aims to optimize for risk-adjusted yield across agentic tokens collateral markets.
Morpho V2 vault — wraps downstream Morpho markets and V1 vaults via adapters.
Some V2 adapters point at Morpho Blue markets directly; their underlying market detail isn't resolvable in the universe-level fetch, so this vault carries a V2 opacity surcharge in the risk model.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
V2 vaults route through adapters into downstream venues. A misbehaving adapter (paused, drained, or pointing at a compromised target) can lock or mismark a portion of the vault until governance acts.
Sequencer halt on Base blocks liquidations and redemptions for 48 hours. Without per-allocation buffers we apply a baseline 0.5% liquidity discount scaled by chain severity (1.0×).
Vault has $0M idle buffer (100% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 0-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (5)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.