Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
You deposit vbUSDC (a Katana-based stablecoin variant) and the vault lends it out to borrowers who post vbWBTC as collateral. The vault earns the interest rate that borrowers pay — currently 3.13% APY — with no un-borrowed cash sitting idle.
Clearstar runs the vault as a single-market operator, concentrating 100% of capital into vbWBTC lending at an 86% loan-to-value ratio.
The 3.13% APY comes entirely from borrowing demand for vbUSDC against vbWBTC collateral, which is running at 82% utilization.
The vault is fully exposed to vbWBTC price movement — a 14% drop below current levels would trigger liquidation of the underlying collateral. vbUSDC itself is not tracked for depeg risk in the system. Complexity and risk scores are both low (30 and 35 out of 100), but the vault holds zero un-borrowed buffer if demand drops.
Avoid if you need liquidity flexibility or fear vbWBTC volatility; consider if you want simple single-asset exposure to BTC-backed lending at low complexity.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
Clearstar Core v2 vault allocates to bluechip assets on Katana which have high liquidity and conservative risk profiles.
Morpho V2 vault — wraps downstream Morpho markets and V1 vaults via adapters.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho V2 that affects the vault's largest single market (100% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 100.0% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 100%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
V2 vaults route through adapters into downstream venues. A misbehaving adapter (paused, drained, or pointing at a compromised target) can lock or mismark a portion of the vault until governance acts.
Vault has $0M idle buffer (17% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 12-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (7)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.