Gauntlet WBTC
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put in vbWBTC (Bitcoin wrapped on Katana) and earn interest by lending it out to borrowers who post LBTC (Liquid Bitcoin) as collateral on Morpho Blue. The interest rate is set by supply and demand—right now there's almost no borrowing demand, so the rate sits at 0.01% APY.
Gauntlet runs this vault with a hands-off approach on a single low-demand market.
The 0.01% APY comes entirely from the tiny amount of borrowing interest paid by users borrowing against LBTC collateral. The vault is 100% un-borrowed cash—no yield acceleration or incentives are active.
Bitcoin depeg risk is the main concern (vbWBTC and LBTC could diverge), but the scoring engine flags no elevated risks. The collateral (LBTC) sits at 92% liquidation threshold with 86% utilization on that market, meaning less buffer than some peers.
Good fit for passive Bitcoin exposure if you're comfortable with wrapped Bitcoin counterparty risk and willing to accept minimal yield in exchange for simplicity and a low-risk setup.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
The Gauntlet WBTC Vault will list a selection of liquid collateral markets and allocate across them to optimize risk-adjusted yield. The Vault's risk strategy will follow the CORE framework, where Gauntlet curates deposits to balance security and yield to provide a moderate risk profile and competitive APY for WBTC suppliers.
What you are actually getting paid for, expressed as a share of net APY.
Interest paid by borrowers on Morpho Blue markets the vault supplies into.
The honest version. Every structural failure mode this vault is exposed to, ranked by severity. If you want to know whether to invest, start here.
Every market relies on an external price feed. A stale or manipulated feed can mis-price collateral and produce unrecoverable bad debt.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Vault has $0M idle buffer (100% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 0-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho Blue that affects the vault's largest single market (0% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 0.1% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 0%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (2)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.