Re Ecosystem USDC
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors send USDC to this vault, which lends it out on Morpho Blue to borrowers who post reUSD (a stablecoin) as collateral. Borrowers pay interest, which flows back to depositors as yield; the rate adjusts based on how much USDC is borrowed versus available.
Clearstar runs this vault and appears to operate a single-market, stablecoin-focused book—all USDC lent against reUSD only.
The 3.19% APY comes almost entirely from borrower interest (3.03%); the vault is fully deployed with no idle cash. A small 0.16% comes from Morpho incentives and curator rebates on the reUSD market.
The material risk is tight liquidation thresholds—reUSD collateral gets seized at only 92% of its value, leaving little margin if reUSD weakens. Concentration in a single collateral type (reUSD) and reliance on reUSD's peg stability are the real exposures here.
Suitable for an allocator comfortable with stablecoin lending and reUSD counterparty risk who wants plain USDC yield; avoid if you need diversification across collateral types or a larger liquidity cushion.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
Clearstar USDC vault on Ethereum, allocating across 4 Morpho Blue markets.
What you are actually getting paid for, expressed as a share of net APY.
Interest paid by borrowers on Morpho Blue markets the vault supplies into.
Estimated boost from Morpho-side rewards programs and curator rebates active on these markets.
The honest version. Every structural failure mode this vault is exposed to, ranked by severity. If you want to know whether to invest, start here.
Weighted LLTV across markets is 91.5%. Sharp collateral drawdowns can trigger cascading liquidations faster than vault parameters can be adjusted.
Primary loan or collateral asset is a stablecoin. A sustained depeg below 99 cents impacts NAV and disables liquidation routing for non-USD collateral.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho Blue that affects the vault's largest single market (100% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 100.0% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 100%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
March 2023 SVB episode: USDC traded as low as $0.88 before banking exposure was clarified. Mark-to-market loss on 100% of vault TVL (the loan asset is USDC).
Vault has $0M idle buffer (30% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 10-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (4)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.