USDhl (Frontier)
- Unrecognized Collateral AssetYELLOWWHLP / USDHL
Morpho has flagged the WHLP / USDHL market: unrecognized_collateral_asset.
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put in USDHL (a stablecoin on HyperEVM) and the vault lends it out on Morpho Blue markets secured by two collateral types — hwHLP and WHLP (both appear to be liquidity provider tokens) — at rates set by borrower demand on those markets.
Felix runs a small, fully-deployed vault ($0.2M) focused entirely on HyperEVM LP-token collateral.
The 8.63% APY comes almost entirely from borrower interest (8.20%) on the hwHLP and WHLP markets, with a small tail from Morpho incentives (0.43%); the vault carries zero idle cash.
The vault's risk score is 40/100 (moderate). Material exposure sits in hwHLP (86% of deposits, 77% liquidation threshold, 82% utilization) and WHLP (14%, same thresholds). USDHL itself is not a tracked stablecoin, so depeg risk is not monitored. Morpho has flagged a YELLOW warning for unrecognized collateral assets — the nature of hwHLP and WHLP is opaque on-chain.
Avoid unless you have conviction on HyperEVM LP tokens and can tolerate unmonitored stablecoin depeg risk; the 8.63% yield does not compensate for collateral opacity at $0.2M scale.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
The Felix USDhl vault lends USDhl across mature listed markets backed by liquid collateral. Allocations rebalance based on demand rates and curator defined safeguards delivering durable stablecoin yield.
What you are actually getting paid for, expressed as a share of net APY.
Interest paid by borrowers on Morpho Blue markets the vault supplies into.
Estimated boost from Morpho-side rewards programs and curator rebates active on these markets.
The honest version. Every structural failure mode this vault is exposed to, ranked by severity. If you want to know whether to invest, start here.
Every market relies on an external price feed. A stale or manipulated feed can mis-price collateral and produce unrecoverable bad debt.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho Blue that affects the vault's largest single market (86% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 86.0% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 100%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
Vault has $0M idle buffer (19% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 11-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (4)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.