Felix USDH
Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.
Depositors put USDH (a stablecoin on HyperEVM) into this vault, and Felix lends it out to borrowers on Morpho Blue against Bitcoin (UBTC, 88% of the vault), staked Hyperliquid (kHYPE, 7%), and wrapped Hyperliquid (WHYPE, 5%). Borrowing rates are set by supply and demand on each market—no human rate-setter.
Felix runs the vault as a straightforward lending book: almost entirely Bitcoin collateral with small satellite positions in Hyperliquid liquid-staking derivatives.
The 0.52% APY comes from borrowers paying 0.49% in lending interest against these collaterals, plus 0.03% from Morpho protocol incentives and curator rebates. All capital is deployed (0% idle cash).
Bitcoin makes up 88% of the vault's lending exposure—so vault returns and losses track UBTC price moves and liquidation risk on UBTC borrowers. Hyperliquid staking tokens add smaller execution risk (7% and 5%), but the low complexity score (25/100) and risk score (16/100) reflect that the underlying collaterals and loan terms are simple.
Good fit for stablecoin allocators seeking plain Bitcoin-backed lending yield with minimal complexity. Avoid if you need higher returns or can't stomach borrower liquidation cascades on UBTC.
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
The Felix USDH vault allocates USDH the Hyperliquid native stablecoin across curated Vanilla markets and manages exposure via caps and rebalancing to pursue consistent risk adjusted yield while accounting for peg and liquidity dynamics specific to USDH.
What you are actually getting paid for, expressed as a share of net APY.
Interest paid by borrowers on Morpho Blue markets the vault supplies into.
Estimated boost from Morpho-side rewards programs and curator rebates active on these markets.
The honest version. Every structural failure mode this vault is exposed to, ranked by severity. If you want to know whether to invest, start here.
Every market relies on an external price feed. A stale or manipulated feed can mis-price collateral and produce unrecoverable bad debt.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho Blue that affects the vault's largest single market (88% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 88.1% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 100%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
Vault has $1M idle buffer (73% of $1M TVL). $49M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 4-day TVM cost. $49M of the request exceeds the vault's $1M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (5)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.