Yearn OG WETH
How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.
Yearn OG vaults lend underlying assets to markets labeled as moderate risk (-2) by the Yearn team. Optimization across markets is handled automatically via an algorithm developed by Yearn. Supply caps are set based on various factors and continuously monitored by the Yearn team as well.
What you are actually getting paid for, expressed as a share of net APY.
Interest paid by borrowers on Morpho Blue markets the vault supplies into.
Estimated boost from Morpho-side rewards programs and curator rebates active on these markets.
The honest version. Every structural failure mode this vault is exposed to, ranked by severity. If you want to know whether to invest, start here.
Weighted LLTV across markets is 93.5%. Sharp collateral drawdowns can trigger cascading liquidations faster than vault parameters can be adjusted.
Cap-weighted utilization is 92.8%, leaving little idle buffer. Large same-day redemptions may queue behind active loan repayments.
What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.
Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.
Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.
A 30%+ cycle drawdown in ETH. USD value of the position falls; ETH-denominated yield is unaffected. Applied to 100% of vault TVL (loan asset is WETH).
Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho Blue that affects the vault's largest single market (37% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.
Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 36.6% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 95%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.
Vault has $0M idle buffer (7% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.84% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 13-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.
100% of TVL is in markets running >85% utilization. Redemption requests on that slice queue until borrowers repay; remaining LPs absorb a small forced-exit discount.
48h sequencer halt on Base. Collateral drifts while liquidations are frozen; the LLTV buffer absorbs liquidation-clearable moves, the excess accrues as bad debt. Plus a small forced-exit discount on the 100% of TVL sitting in markets above 85% utilization. Total -0.51% NAV loss.
An LST used as collateral loses peg to ETH (e.g., withdrawal queue congestion, à la May/June 2022 stETH). 67.6% of TVL is in liquid staking token (LST) markets (weighted LLTV 94%). A 7% collateral shock translates to ~0.10% NAV loss after the 6-pt LLTV buffer absorbs liquidation-clearable price moves.
On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.
Market parameters (7)
Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.
180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.