Back to vault universe
0x0571…7dBEAA
U

Gauntlet uETH Vault

gtuETH
HyperEVM
Curated by Gauntlet·Inception 2025-05-06·Guardian 0x0685bf23B2f8EA5Fb762427ea0427Eb7fc065E8f
HyperEVM
UETH
Open on Morpho
Net APY1.70%
+0.73%30d 0.98%
Trend up
TVL$204.71K
-7.69%Capacity $307.06K
Trend up
Utilization49%
Underutilized
Risk score
15
Low
Market 14
·Loan demand 34
Complexity0Easy to explain
Liquidity71/100
Instant redemption available
Performance fee10%Above median
AI vault read

Plain-English summary of this vault — what it does, who runs it, where the yield comes from, and what could break it. Generated from the same deterministic inputs shown elsewhere on this page; the numbers are the source, this is just the explanation.

What this vault does

Depositors put in UETH and the vault lends it out on Morpho Blue to borrowers who post cmETH (Coinbase staked ETH) as collateral. The vault earns interest paid by those borrowers, with the un-borrowed 47% sitting idle. The lending rate is set by supply and demand—when cmETH borrowers need liquidity, they pay the vault's LPs to borrow.

Who runs it

Gauntlet runs this vault; the data shows a single-collateral, single-asset book focused on cmETH lending at 92% loan-to-value.

Where the yield comes from

The 1.70% APY comes almost entirely (1.62%) from borrower interest on cmETH loans at 93% utilization, with a small 0.08% contribution from Morpho rewards. Nearly half the vault sits un-borrowed, dragging the blended rate down.

What could break it

The vault's sole risk is cmETH price movement relative to UETH—if Coinbase staked ETH falls sharply, the 92% LTV means borrowers near liquidation. The risk score of 15/100 reflects low technical complexity and no material shortfalls in the current cmETH market.

Who this is for

Good fit for conservative allocators seeking stablecoin-like returns on ETH-derivative collateral if comfortable with a single collateral type and willing to accept that 47% idle cash drags yield.

Risk decomposition

How the composite risk score breaks down. Every number traces to an explicit input — /methodology documents each factor's formula.

blue-chip15/100
Warning floorfloor
0
Structuralweight 28%
12+3.4
Liquidationweight 20%
43+8.6
Yield anomalyweight 20%
0+0.0
Concentrationweight 12%
0+0.0
Liquidityweight 10%
10+1.0
Maturityweight 10%
23+2.3
Depeg floorfloor
0
Composite = max(Σ weighted + floors). Warning and depeg floors are hard minimums; the weighted sum of the structural factors is the base. A floor highlighted in amber means it is what determines the final score — the protocol or peg signals are louder than our structural model.
Plain English explanationWritten by VaultScanner research · model card · last update 2026-05-12
What this vault actually does

The Gauntlet WETH Vault will list a selection of liquid collateral markets and allocate across them to optimize risk-adjusted yield. The Vaults risk strategy will follow the CORE framework where Gauntlet curates deposits to balance security and yield to provide a moderate risk profile and competitive APY for WETH suppliers.

Yield decomposition

What you are actually getting paid for, expressed as a share of net APY.

Hover for source breakdownTotal · 1.70% gross APY
Curator performance fee10.00%1.70% net
Borrower lending demand
Structural

Interest paid by borrowers on Morpho Blue markets the vault supplies into.

1.62%95.3% of yield · 162 bps
Protocol incentives
Incentive

Estimated boost from Morpho-side rewards programs and curator rebates active on these markets.

0.08%4.7% of yield · 8 bps
What breaks this vault

The honest version. Every structural failure mode this vault is exposed to, ranked by severity. If you want to know whether to invest, start here.

Every market relies on an external price feed. A stale or manipulated feed can mis-price collateral and produce unrecoverable bad debt.

Hidden exposure map

What this vault is actually exposed to — including dependencies that are not visible from the strategy name.

cmETH
53%
Lending venueCollateral asset in vault allocations.
UETH
100%
Lending venueLoan asset supplied by the vault.
Reading this map. Direct exposures are the assets the vault holds or lends against. Indirect dependencies (Tab 3) include the protocols that mint those assets, the oracles pricing them, and the bridges that move them. An incident at any indirect dependency can damage the vault even when the direct collateral looks healthy.
Allocation breakdown

Every market the vault has supplied into, with current LTV, LLTV, oracle, and IRM. Idle balances are listed explicitly.

Markets1+ idle buffer
cmETH / UETH52.7%
idle / UETH47.3%
MarketProtocolAllocationLTV / LLTVUtilizationOracleIRM
idle / UETHMorpho Blue
47.3%$96.81K
0x00000000…0x00000000…
cmETH / UETHMorpho Blue
52.7%$107.89K
78% / 91.5%13.7 pts headroom
93%0x7f893Ef7…0xD4a426F0…
Stress scenarios

Modeled NAV impact under historical and hypothetical tail events. Each impact = − (shock magnitude) × (vault exposure) × (pass-through). Hover the calculator icon for the per-scenario formula.

Morpho contract vulnerability
rare
computed

Tail-case: a vulnerability surfaces in Morpho Blue that affects the vault's largest single market (53% of TVL). Modeled at 50% loss on that exposure; full vault is not assumed at risk since markets are isolated.

−50% × 53% (largest market) × 100% pass-through
-26.4%
Recovery patch + governance
53% exposed
Curator misallocation
unlikely
computed

Curator routes into a market that develops bad debt or an oracle break. Worst single position is 52.7% of TVL; top-3 concentration is 53%. Modeled at 50% bad-debt recovery on the worst position.

−50% × 52.7% (worst market) × 100% pass-through
-26.4%
Recovery 30–90 days
53% exposed
$50M same-day redemption
possible
computed

Vault has $0M idle buffer (51% of $0M TVL). $50M of the $50M request queues; the redeemer takes a ~0.50% forced-exit discount weighted across collateral mix plus 7-day TVM cost. $50M of the request exceeds the vault's $0M TVL and cannot be redeemed at all.

queued 100% of $50M × (0.50% forced-exit discount + 0.14% TVM over 6.9 days at 7.4% rate)
-0.6%
Recovery 0–14 days (queue depth)
100% exposed
L2 sequencer halt 48h
unlikely
computed

48h sequencer halt on HyperEVM. Collateral drifts while liquidations are frozen; the LLTV buffer absorbs liquidation-clearable moves, the excess accrues as bad debt. Plus a small forced-exit discount on the 53% of TVL sitting in markets above 85% utilization. Total -0.27% NAV loss.

48h × HyperEVM severity 1.5×: bad-debt across 53% of TVL (≈0.00%) + forced-exit discount on 53% stressed-utilization markets (≈0.26%)
-0.3%
Recovery 48 hours + 1–3 day catch-up
53% exposed
Governance & configuration

On-chain contracts, control surface, and per-market parameters. The diligence checklist surface — every value here is what an allocator needs to copy into a memo before sizing a deposit.

Vault contractMetaMorpho v1 on Morpho Blue
Chain
HyperEVM
CuratorRisk team setting market allocations
OwnerCan change curator, guardian, and timelock (after delay)
GuardianCan pause and revoke allocations if compromised
TimelockDelay before owner-initiated parameter changes take effect
3 days
Performance feeCurator's cut of generated yield
10.00%
Fee recipientAddress that collects the performance fee
Skim recipientReceives stray non-loan-asset tokens swept from the vault
Deployed12 mos on-chain
May 6, 2025
One-click redeem
available
Morpho app

Market parameters (2)

Oracle, IRM, and LLTV per Morpho Blue market the vault routes into. Click an address to inspect the contract on a block explorer.
MarketLLTVUtilOracleIRM
idle / UETH0%0x0000…00000x0000…0000
cmETH / UETH91.5%93%0x7f89…41a60xD4a4…7483
Activity

Curator and parameter changes detected by VaultScanner's snapshot diff. Refreshed every 6 hours.

Full feed →
Historical analytics

180 trailing days. APY, TVL, utilization, and an APY drawdown view to show how the vault has actually behaved — not just where it sits today.

APY range0.00% – 1.90%
trailing 180d
APY volatility (σ)0.55 pts
standard deviation
Max APY drawdownNaN%
peak-to-trough
APY trend+1.23 pts
180d delta